California's Powerful Protections for Disability Rights in the Workplace

April 12, 2024

People with Disabilities are One of the Most Vulnerable Groups to Suffer from Workplace Rights Violations.

Disabilities come in various shapes and forms and there is a substantial number of people who live with some kind of disability. In the US alone, 12.50% of the overall US population was living with a disability. But when it comes to the workforce, only 2.2% of employees are disabled people and statistics show that several disabled people drop out of the labor force because nobody will give them an opportunity.


California disability rights make discriminating against an employee or prospective employee illegal; however, some employers still do it, because many employees lack the necessary resources or knowledge about their rights to hold them accountable.


What Qualifies as a Disability in California?

The state of California dictates that employers must adhere to the Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA), which defines a disability as either: Physical (any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that affects one or more major body systems and limits a major life activity), mental (any mental or psychological disorder or condition that limits a major life activity) or a medical condition (any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer, or a record or history of cancer[TK1] , or genetic characteristic).


FEHA also protects against discrimination based on a perceived disability or being associated with someone who has a disability. It is important to note that FEHA's definition is broad and aims to encompass a wide range of conditions to ensure comprehensive protection for individuals with disabilities. In the workplace, any condition that interferes with the performance of a major life activity is considered a disability under California law.


These disabilities can vary in duration, from permanent conditions to temporary setbacks. Regardless of the duration, the regulations remain consistent. It is unlawful for an employer to subject individuals with disabilities to less favorable treatment compared to other employees solely based on their disability. It is important to note that for a claim of disability discrimination to hold ground, the employee must be genuinely disabled or perceived as such and must possess the qualifications required for the job position.


What Protections Does The State Offer?

In California, individuals with disabilities benefit from the protection of two primary legislative acts: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at the federal level, and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) at the state level.


  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Enacted in 1990, the ADA is a federal law designed to establish clear, robust, and enforceable standards against discrimination faced by individuals with disabilities. It prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against disabled individuals capable of performing essential job functions, even if they need reasonable accommodations. The law sets criteria for determining disability and outlines what accommodations are considered reasonable. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces the ADA, issuing regulations and settling complaints.
  • The Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA): Dating back to 1959 FEHA is California's equivalent of the ADA. It aims to remedy discrimination and safeguard employee rights. Under FEHA, employers with five or more employees are prohibited from discriminating based on physical or mental disabilities, medical conditions, or genetic information. The Civil Rights Department (CRD) enforces FEHA, offering a complaint resolution process for aggrieved employees.


So, what does each law comprise and how are they different?

While FEHA predates the ADA, significant revisions in 1992 aligned it closely with federal law. Despite similarities, FEHA often provides greater protection for disabled employees. Notably, the ADA allows states to enact laws offering equal or stronger employee protections. California, therefore, requires compliance with the most stringent standards.


Key distinctions between FEHA and the ADA include FEHA's broader definition of "disability," unlimited damages recoverable under FEHA, its applicability to employers with five or more employees, and broader obligations for reasonable accommodations compared to the ADA. As FEHA grants more rights to employees, it is frequently the preferred avenue for relief in legal claims against employers.


What To Do if an Employer Doesn’t Comply?

California legislation safeguards employees from various forms of discrimination. Specifically, employers are prohibited from refusing to hire an individual based on their disability, declining to choose an individual for a training program with potential employment due to the prospective employee's disability, terminating an employee due to their disability, offering lower compensation to an employee because of their disability, or imposing restrictions on other job-related terms, conditions, or privileges.


In cases where an employee's disability affects their ability to perform their essential job duties, California law mandates that employers make reasonable accommodations. Reasonable accommodation involves adjusting the employee's work environment to facilitate the performance of essential job functions.


If, in the current position, there is no feasible way to accommodate the employee's disability, the employee may still retain rights. For instance, the employer might be obligated to inform the employee of other suitable job opportunities within the company.


Conclusion

If your employer flatly rejects accommodations for your disability, engages in disparate treatment based on your condition, or subjects you to verbal abuse, you are encountering discrimination. In such instances, you have the right to hold your employer legally accountable for the challenges you have endured due to their actions.


An experienced employment law firm can provide guidance, support, and legal representation to help you pursue justice and hold your employer accountable for their actions. Our experienced labor rights lawyers at Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights are here to guide you toward a resolution that upholds your rights and dignity.


Call 844-697-4448 today for a free and confidential consultation to get the help you need and deserve.

Share on Social Media

Man in suit yelling at another man at a table, holding a paper; office setting.
December 9, 2025
Should California employees accept a severance package? Learn what to consider, potential risks, and tips for negotiating a fair offer.
Woman with head in hands, sitting at a table with a laptop, while two coworkers whisper
December 5, 2025
Facing workplace bias in California? Discover how to prove race discrimination and build a strong case with evidence and expert guidance.
November 24, 2025
California has wrapped up another busy legislative session, and Governor Gavin Newsom has approved a wide range of new workplace laws that employers will need to prepare for in 2026 and beyond. These measures touch nearly every corner of employment compliance, from labor rights and pay transparency to leave rules, recordkeeping, and restrictions on certain contract terms. Below are a few key changes that stand out. 1. Expanded Labor Rights for Workers and Gig Drivers A new law (AB 288) strengthens workers’ rights to organize and gives the Public Employment Relations Board the power to step in when federal labor protections fall short. Another measure (AB 1340) creates a framework allowing certain gig-economy drivers to unionize and negotiate industry-wide standards without changing their independent contractor status. 2. Broader Pay Data and Equal Pay Requirements Under SB 464, employers with 100 or more workers will face stricter pay-data reporting rules, including penalties for failing to file and expanded job-category reporting starting in 2027. SB 642 also updates California’s Equal Pay Act by clarifying what counts as wages, including bonuses, equity, and benefits, and setting a six-year limit for filing claims. 3. New Limits on Repayment Agreements AB 692 restricts employers from requiring workers to repay training costs or other debts when they leave a job, unless very specific exceptions apply (such as accredited programs or prorated hiring bonuses). Most repayment-based contract terms tied to separation will no longer be allowed. Read more in the National Law Review, HERE .
More Posts