Return To Office Order in California: What It Means for State Worker Rights

May 9, 2025
A group of business people are sitting around a table with laptops.

How Will California Governor Newsom’s Return to Work Order Change the Landscape for State Workers?


Big changes are coming for California’s state workers. Starting July 1, 2025, most state employees will need to return to the office at least four days a week. This is part of a new directive from Governor Gavin Newsom, called
Executive Order N-22-25. It officially ends the flexible remote work policies that started during the COVID-19 pandemic. 


Under the new rules, state agencies must require employees to be in the office four days a week. They will make some exceptions. For example, this includes people with health needs or those who live far from their work site. But for most employees, the message is clear: It’s time to come back. 


Governor Newsom says this move is about improving teamwork, communication, and accountability. He believes that meeting in person helps state employees decide faster and serve the public better. 


California isn’t alone. All across the country, both public agencies and private companies are rethinking remote work. Many are shifting back to more in-person work time.

What Are Employees and Unions Saying? 

Not everyone is happy about this decision. 


Labor unions, including SEIU Local 1000, strongly oppose the mandate. They say the policy is “out of touch” and unnecessary. According to the union, remote work has proven successful—and employees have been just as productive from home. Plus, working remotely helps people better balance work and personal life. 


Others worry about the extra costs of commuting and how it might affect morale. The CASE union, which includes attorneys and judges, criticized the sudden change. They believe it ignores the benefits of remote work and could even break current labor agreements.

Can the State Make It Work? 

Even though the rules are in place, not all departments are ready. 


Some state offices are struggling to make sure employees return as expected. There are also questions about space and resources. After years of working remotely, many buildings need updates or repairs to handle more people again. 


Lawmakers have raised concerns too. They say the state hasn’t fully figured out how much this return will cost—including money for office upkeep, utilities, and renovations.

A Bigger Picture: This Is Happening Nationwide 

California’s move is part of a larger national trend. Other states, like Texas, are also pushing government employees back to the office. Leaders in both parties say that being in-person helps with efficiency and better service. 


In other words, remote work may not be the long-term norm for many public jobs.

What Happens Next?

As the July 1 deadline gets closer, a lot depends on how well the state explains and enforces the new rules. The decision will shape daily life for thousands of state workers—and maybe even influence how other states handle remote work. 


Finding the right balance between flexibility and face-to-face teamwork is no easy task. This policy could become a model for success—or a cautionary tale. 


Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights is an employment law firm out of Burbank, California. We serve clients statewide with a wide range of employment rights representation. Looking for legal help? Use the form below or call Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights today.


This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. 



Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is California’s Return to Office Order?
California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Order N-22-25 requires most state employees to return to the office at least four days a week starting July 1, 2025. It ends many of the flexible remote work arrangements put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic.


2. Who is affected by the return-to-office mandate?
Most state employees are affected, except for those with health needs, significant commuting challenges, or other approved exceptions. The order applies across nearly all state agencies.


3. Why is California requiring employees to return to the office?
The order aims to improve teamwork, communication, and accountability. Governor Newsom believes in-person collaboration helps state employees make decisions faster and serve the public more effectively.


4. What are the main concerns of California employees and unions?
Labor unions and employees have raised concerns about the mandate’s sudden implementation, potential costs for commuting, effects on morale, and the loss of work-life balance benefits that remote work provided. Some unions argue the policy may even conflict with existing labor agreements.


5. Are state agencies ready for this change?
Not all departments are fully prepared. Many offices need updates or repairs to accommodate employees returning in person, and there are ongoing questions about space, resources, and additional costs for utilities and office maintenance.


6. Is this return-to-office trend happening elsewhere?
Yes. Other states, such as Texas, are also requiring government employees to return to offices. Nationwide, public and private organizations are re-evaluating remote work and emphasizing in-person collaboration for efficiency and service quality.



7. What should California state employees do if they have concerns about the mandate?
Employees can discuss accommodations with their supervisors, review applicable labor agreements, or consult an employment attorney to understand their rights. Legal advice may help navigate exceptions, workplace policies, or disputes related to the return-to-office order.

Share on Social Media

July 28, 2026
Can your employer punish you for speaking up? In many situations, the answer is no. Whistleblower protection in California exists to help protect employees who report illegal activity or refuse to participate in conduct that violates the law. Even so, retaliation still happens. Employees may suddenly receive poor performance reviews, lose promotions, have their hours reduced, or even lose their jobs after reporting a problem. Understanding your rights can make a significant difference if you believe your employer retaliated against you after you spoke up.  Many employees notice something at work that doesn't seem right. It could be wage theft, safety violations, discrimination, fraud, harassment, patient care issues, environmental violations, or another type of unlawful conduct. Reporting those concerns takes courage.
July 21, 2026
When should you receive your final paycheck under California law? The answer depends on how your employment ended. If you were fired, your employer is generally required to provide your final paycheck immediately. If you resigned, the deadline depends on whether you gave at least 72 hours' notice before leaving. Missing those deadlines can lead to more than just a late paycheck. In some situations, employees may have the right to recover additional wages and other remedies under California law. Understanding how California final paycheck laws protect your wages can help you recognize when your employer may not have followed the law. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct.
July 14, 2026
What Is an Example of Quid Pro Quo Harassment at Work? Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone with authority over an employee makes a job benefit or employment decision contingent on the employee accepting or rejecting unwelcome sexual advances or other inappropriate sexual conduct. In other words, a supervisor or manager may suggest, either directly or indirectly, that a promotion, raise, preferred schedule, continued employment, or another workplace benefit depends on the employee complying with an inappropriate request. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct. In this guide, we'll explain what quid pro quo harassment means under California law, review common workplace examples, and discuss the rights employees may have if they experience this type of unlawful conduct. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.
More Posts