California AB 288 & Worker Rights: What Employees Need to Know in 2025

October 15, 2025
California State Capitol building with the state flag waving against a blue sky.

California has passed a new law that gives the state power to protect workers when the federal government can’t or won’t.


Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed Assembly Bill 288 (AB 288), which lets California’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) handle workplace complaints that would normally go to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The move comes after the NLRB lost its quorum under the Trump administration, leaving thousands of labor cases unresolved.


Under AB 288, if the NLRB fails to act on a complaint for six months or can’t function due to vacant seats, workers and unions can take their cases directly to PERB. The agency can investigate, issue penalties, and order remedies — ensuring employees don’t lose their rights to organize or report unfair treatment.


Supporters say the law keeps California workers protected while the federal system is stalled. “We will not sit idly by while our workers are being exploited,” said Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Inglewood), who authored the bill.


Critics, including the California Chamber of Commerce, argue the measure is unconstitutional because labor relations fall under federal jurisdiction through the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Legal experts expect a court battle similar to one already underway in New York over a comparable law.


If upheld, AB 288 could make California one of the most pro-worker states in the country, giving unions and employees a faster, state-level path to justice when federal agencies fail to act.


Read more at Times of San Diego.

Share on Social Media

California Whistleblower Laws: Understanding Your Rights Against Retaliation

July 28, 2026
Can your employer punish you for speaking up? In many situations, the answer is no. Whistleblower protection in California exists to help protect employees who report illegal activity or refuse to participate in conduct that violates the law. Even so, retaliation still happens. Employees may suddenly receive poor performance reviews, lose promotions, have their hours reduced, or even lose their jobs after reporting a problem. Understanding your rights can make a significant difference if you believe your employer retaliated against you after you spoke up.  Many employees notice something at work that doesn't seem right. It could be wage theft, safety violations, discrimination, fraud, harassment, patient care issues, environmental violations, or another type of unlawful conduct. Reporting those concerns takes courage.

What California Employees Should Know About Final Paycheck Laws

July 21, 2026
When should you receive your final paycheck under California law? The answer depends on how your employment ended. If you were fired, your employer is generally required to provide your final paycheck immediately. If you resigned, the deadline depends on whether you gave at least 72 hours' notice before leaving. Missing those deadlines can lead to more than just a late paycheck. In some situations, employees may have the right to recover additional wages and other remedies under California law. Understanding how California final paycheck laws protect your wages can help you recognize when your employer may not have followed the law. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct.

What Is Quid Pro Quo Harassment - Examples and Employee Rights in California

July 14, 2026
What Is an Example of Quid Pro Quo Harassment at Work? Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone with authority over an employee makes a job benefit or employment decision contingent on the employee accepting or rejecting unwelcome sexual advances or other inappropriate sexual conduct. In other words, a supervisor or manager may suggest, either directly or indirectly, that a promotion, raise, preferred schedule, continued employment, or another workplace benefit depends on the employee complying with an inappropriate request. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct. In this guide, we'll explain what quid pro quo harassment means under California law, review common workplace examples, and discuss the rights employees may have if they experience this type of unlawful conduct. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.
More Posts