Getting Fired for Using Legal Marijuana May Be Illegal

August 30, 2020
Two hand holding marijuana

It goes by a lot of names: Trees, Weed, Wisdom Weed, Whacky Tabacky, Pot, Grass, Reefer, Ganja, Herb, Chronic, and more. But “cannabis” is the legal term for recreational marijuana in California, where its been legalized for both adult-use and medical use. In fact, California laws are some of the most relaxed laws in the nation with regard to cannabis use.


While you do have to be 21 or older to possess, purchase, or use recreational cannabis, there are very few restrictions as long as cannabis is consumed as outlined in the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA).


Here’s an important employment rights question: What happens if you use cannabis legally, and get fired unfairly? Clearly, as the laws continue to change, legal users need to know their rights.

Okay, marijuana is legal… but can I get fired for using it?

Several states—including California—have passed laws legalizing marijuana for recreational use. However, these laws generally do not protect employees from being fired due to their off-duty marijuana use. In fact, many of these laws expressly state that they do not affect an employer’s right to continue to enforce zero-tolerance workplace drug policies.


So what is the simple answer to the above question? It all depends on where you work. Even Elon Musk knows that!

  • Can you hang out with co-workers on Friday night and smoke some weed?
  • Can you eat an edible after a long day at work?
  • Can you puff on a vape pen on your lunch hour?
  • What about being drug tested?


The answers to these questions are changing as fast as the marijuana laws are changing. In California, there are no workplace provisions protecting the rights of medical marijuana patients. In fact, there are no laws requiring accommodation for medicating on the job or protection from termination.


KNOW YOUR RIGHTS | KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

In a rapidly changing landscape of marijuana legalization across the United States, the issue of wrongful termination due to legal marijuana use has come to the forefront. The evolving legality of cannabis has raised complex questions about employee rights, workplace policies, and the boundaries between personal life and professional conduct. Wrongful termination cases related to legal marijuana use shed light on the intricate interplay between state laws, employment regulations, and individual rights.


As more states embrace the decriminalization or legalization of both medical and recreational marijuana, employees who legally consume cannabis outside of work hours are encountering situations where their off-duty activities clash with their professional responsibilities. Many individuals have found themselves facing the perplexing situation of being fired or disciplined for engaging in lawful behavior within their private lives. However, numerous jurisdictions are taking steps to protect employees from such wrongful termination, recognizing that off-duty marijuana use, especially for medicinal purposes, should not jeopardize one's livelihood. As employees and employers navigate this emerging legal landscape, it becomes evident that staying informed about local regulations and advocating for fair workplace policies is crucial to ensure that individuals aren't unfairly penalized for using a substance that's legal in their state.

If you believe you were wrongfully terminated, the Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights can help.


Call us today for a free and confidential consultation to get the help you need and deserve.


Share on Social Media

July 14, 2026
What Is an Example of Quid Pro Quo Harassment at Work? Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone with authority over an employee makes a job benefit or employment decision contingent on the employee accepting or rejecting unwelcome sexual advances or other inappropriate sexual conduct. In other words, a supervisor or manager may suggest, either directly or indirectly, that a promotion, raise, preferred schedule, continued employment, or another workplace benefit depends on the employee complying with an inappropriate request. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct. In this guide, we'll explain what quid pro quo harassment means under California law, review common workplace examples, and discuss the rights employees may have if they experience this type of unlawful conduct. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.
July 6, 2026
What Qualifies as Workplace Harassment in California? Workplace harassment generally involves unwelcome conduct based on a legally protected characteristic that is severe enough or pervasive enough to create a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment. Not every rude comment, personality conflict, or difficult supervisor violates California law. However, when harassment is based on characteristics such as sex, race, disability, religion, age, or another protected status, employees may have important legal rights.  Many employees wonder whether what they are experiencing is simply an unpleasant work environment or something that may violate California law. The answer depends on the specific facts, including what happened, why it happened, how often it occurred, and whether it was connected to a protected characteristic. Understanding what qualifies as workplace harassment is the first step toward protecting your rights. In this guide, we'll explain what workplace harassment is under California law, review common real-world examples, and discuss what employees can do if they believe they have been subjected to unlawful harassment. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.
June 30, 2026
Can My Employer Legally Monitor My Emails, Text Messages, or Personal Phone? Sometimes, but not always. California employers generally have broad authority to monitor communications and activity on company-owned devices, email accounts, and computer systems. However, that does not mean they can freely access your personal phone, private email account, text messages, or other personal information whenever they choose. Whether the monitoring is lawful often depends on who owns the device, what company policies are in place, whether you gave consent, and the specific facts surrounding the situation. Many employees assume they have no privacy rights once they walk into work. Others believe their personal devices and accounts are always protected, even when they use them for work-related purposes. The reality falls somewhere in between, and California provides employees with stronger workplace privacy protections than many other states. If you believe your employer may have crossed the line, understanding where those legal boundaries exist is an important first step. Below are some of the most common questions employees ask about workplace monitoring, what employers can legally access, and when it may be appropriate to speak with a California employment attorney. If your situation is not covered here, our office is always available to answer your questions.
More Posts