Stoned at Work: A Workplace Discrimination Debate

December 12, 2019
stoned at work, workplace discrimination

A survey published by Drug and Alcohol Review found that 5% of California adults over the age of 21 had used medical cannabis at least once for a “severe” condition. Whereas, 5% of California employees is approximately one million people.


Now, what happens when these legal medical cannabis users go to work? Hence, the workplace discrimination debate.


According to the same survey, “many employers nonetheless prohibit workers from using medical cannabis but allow them to use other, more dangerous and addictive drugs such as opiates when prescribed by their physicians.”


This double standard needs to be re-stated: Employers can prohibit workers from using medically prescribed cannabis—but at the same time allow them to use other medically prescribed drugs.

Is employer bias against cannabis use workplace discrimination?

All of us know friends and family members who have been fired unfairly or been discriminated against at work. It seems like employers can always find creative reasons to fire someone, regardless of whether it’s legal or not.


Currently, there’s a new area of employment law that’s being debated in California: As marijuana laws continue to change, how does this affect workplace discrimination against medical marijuana patients? While marijuana may be legal for adults 21 and over, you can still lose your job for marijuana use while you are not at work—regardless of whether it was medically prescribed or not.


Legally, California employers are allowed to deny employment opportunities or cease employing someone based on their cannabis use, regardless of whether cannabis was medically prescribed.

Are there efforts to change the law?

There are efforts to change the law but as of 2021—even though California has legalized the use of both recreational and medicinal marijuana—an employer still has a right to refuse to hire someone or make workplace accommodations to those who have tested positive for the drug. In fact, California’s highest court has written that the state’s legalization statute did not give marijuana the same status as legal prescription drugs.


With regard to the drug’s illegal status under federal law, the court held that the state’s disability-discrimination statute did not require employers to accommodate illegal drug use. But the times continue to change. That’s why our employment attorneys will continue to monitor and study this debate.

Know Your Rights | Tell Us YOUR Story.

Because California is an “at-will” employment state (employers are free to terminate employees at any time) employees think that they have no rights. Nothing could be further from the truth. Learn more about your employee rights. Contact us today.


Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights (LFECR) is a leading California employment law firm. With more than forty remote attorneys, LFECR is prepared to work on behalf of their clients anywhere in California.


Fired unfairly? Take advantage of a free legal consultation with LFECR.

If you have concerns about workplace discrimination and how it impacts your wellness, the Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights can help.


Call us today for a free and confidential consultation to get the help you need and deserve.


Share on Social Media

What Is Quid Pro Quo Harassment - Examples and Employee Rights in California

July 14, 2026
What Is an Example of Quid Pro Quo Harassment at Work? Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone with authority over an employee makes a job benefit or employment decision contingent on the employee accepting or rejecting unwelcome sexual advances or other inappropriate sexual conduct. In other words, a supervisor or manager may suggest, either directly or indirectly, that a promotion, raise, preferred schedule, continued employment, or another workplace benefit depends on the employee complying with an inappropriate request. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct. In this guide, we'll explain what quid pro quo harassment means under California law, review common workplace examples, and discuss the rights employees may have if they experience this type of unlawful conduct. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.

What Is Considered Workplace Harassment in California? Common Examples and Your Legal Rights

July 6, 2026
What Qualifies as Workplace Harassment in California? Workplace harassment generally involves unwelcome conduct based on a legally protected characteristic that is severe enough or pervasive enough to create a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment. Not every rude comment, personality conflict, or difficult supervisor violates California law. However, when harassment is based on characteristics such as sex, race, disability, religion, age, or another protected status, employees may have important legal rights.  Many employees wonder whether what they are experiencing is simply an unpleasant work environment or something that may violate California law. The answer depends on the specific facts, including what happened, why it happened, how often it occurred, and whether it was connected to a protected characteristic. Understanding what qualifies as workplace harassment is the first step toward protecting your rights. In this guide, we'll explain what workplace harassment is under California law, review common real-world examples, and discuss what employees can do if they believe they have been subjected to unlawful harassment. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.

Can My Employer Monitor My Emails, Text Messages, or Personal Phone in California

June 30, 2026
Can My Employer Legally Monitor My Emails, Text Messages, or Personal Phone? Sometimes, but not always. California employers generally have broad authority to monitor communications and activity on company-owned devices, email accounts, and computer systems. However, that does not mean they can freely access your personal phone, private email account, text messages, or other personal information whenever they choose. Whether the monitoring is lawful often depends on who owns the device, what company policies are in place, whether you gave consent, and the specific facts surrounding the situation. Many employees assume they have no privacy rights once they walk into work. Others believe their personal devices and accounts are always protected, even when they use them for work-related purposes. The reality falls somewhere in between, and California provides employees with stronger workplace privacy protections than many other states. If you believe your employer may have crossed the line, understanding where those legal boundaries exist is an important first step. Below are some of the most common questions employees ask about workplace monitoring, what employers can legally access, and when it may be appropriate to speak with a California employment attorney. If your situation is not covered here, our office is always available to answer your questions.
More Posts