Stoned at Work: A Workplace Discrimination Debate

December 12, 2019
stoned at work, workplace discrimination

A survey published by Drug and Alcohol Review found that 5% of California adults over the age of 21 had used medical cannabis at least once for a “severe” condition. Whereas, 5% of California employees is approximately one million people.


Now, what happens when these legal medical cannabis users go to work? Hence, the workplace discrimination debate.


According to the same survey, “many employers nonetheless prohibit workers from using medical cannabis but allow them to use other, more dangerous and addictive drugs such as opiates when prescribed by their physicians.”


This double standard needs to be re-stated: Employers can prohibit workers from using medically prescribed cannabis—but at the same time allow them to use other medically prescribed drugs.

Is employer bias against cannabis use workplace discrimination?

All of us know friends and family members who have been fired unfairly or been discriminated against at work. It seems like employers can always find creative reasons to fire someone, regardless of whether it’s legal or not.


Currently, there’s a new area of employment law that’s being debated in California: As marijuana laws continue to change, how does this affect workplace discrimination against medical marijuana patients? While marijuana may be legal for adults 21 and over, you can still lose your job for marijuana use while you are not at work—regardless of whether it was medically prescribed or not.


Legally, California employers are allowed to deny employment opportunities or cease employing someone based on their cannabis use, regardless of whether cannabis was medically prescribed.

Are there efforts to change the law?

There are efforts to change the law but as of 2021—even though California has legalized the use of both recreational and medicinal marijuana—an employer still has a right to refuse to hire someone or make workplace accommodations to those who have tested positive for the drug. In fact, California’s highest court has written that the state’s legalization statute did not give marijuana the same status as legal prescription drugs.


With regard to the drug’s illegal status under federal law, the court held that the state’s disability-discrimination statute did not require employers to accommodate illegal drug use. But the times continue to change. That’s why our employment attorneys will continue to monitor and study this debate.

Know Your Rights | Tell Us YOUR Story.

Because California is an “at-will” employment state (employers are free to terminate employees at any time) employees think that they have no rights. Nothing could be further from the truth. Learn more about your employee rights. Contact us today.


Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights (LFECR) is a leading California employment law firm. With more than forty remote attorneys, LFECR is prepared to work on behalf of their clients anywhere in California.


Fired unfairly? Take advantage of a free legal consultation with LFECR.

If you have concerns about workplace discrimination and how it impacts your wellness, the Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights can help.


Call us today for a free and confidential consultation to get the help you need and deserve.


Share on Social Media

Man in suit yelling at another man at a table, holding a paper; office setting.

California Employees: Should You Accept a Severance Package?

December 9, 2025
Should California employees accept a severance package? Learn what to consider, potential risks, and tips for negotiating a fair offer.
Woman with head in hands, sitting at a table with a laptop, while two coworkers whisper

How to Prove Race Discrimination in the California Workplace

December 5, 2025
Facing workplace bias in California? Discover how to prove race discrimination and build a strong case with evidence and expert guidance.

California’s Evolving Workplace - Highlights from the 2025 Legislative Session

November 24, 2025
California has wrapped up another busy legislative session, and Governor Gavin Newsom has approved a wide range of new workplace laws that employers will need to prepare for in 2026 and beyond. These measures touch nearly every corner of employment compliance, from labor rights and pay transparency to leave rules, recordkeeping, and restrictions on certain contract terms. Below are a few key changes that stand out. 1. Expanded Labor Rights for Workers and Gig Drivers A new law (AB 288) strengthens workers’ rights to organize and gives the Public Employment Relations Board the power to step in when federal labor protections fall short. Another measure (AB 1340) creates a framework allowing certain gig-economy drivers to unionize and negotiate industry-wide standards without changing their independent contractor status. 2. Broader Pay Data and Equal Pay Requirements Under SB 464, employers with 100 or more workers will face stricter pay-data reporting rules, including penalties for failing to file and expanded job-category reporting starting in 2027. SB 642 also updates California’s Equal Pay Act by clarifying what counts as wages, including bonuses, equity, and benefits, and setting a six-year limit for filing claims. 3. New Limits on Repayment Agreements AB 692 restricts employers from requiring workers to repay training costs or other debts when they leave a job, unless very specific exceptions apply (such as accredited programs or prorated hiring bonuses). Most repayment-based contract terms tied to separation will no longer be allowed. Read more in the National Law Review, HERE .
More Posts