Pregnant "Jack in the Box" Employee Gets Fired After California Meal and Break Laws Were Violated

February 9, 2020
california meal and break laws, california meal break law, wage theft

Then gets 1,440 hours of back pay…


Lawyers for Employment & Consumer Rights (LFECR) fights for you every day—and we’re here to report another win… this time a settlement and back pay for a California mother. 


Here are the details...


Paula Lopez, a pregnant, low-wage fast food worker at a California Jack in the Box recently had her wages stolen and her job taken. Unfortunately, Paula Lopez is not alone. Violations to California Meal and Break Laws, and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) violations are rampant in the restaurant industry. In fact, various types of wage and hour violations, as well as wrongful termination firings, happen thousands of times a year and most of these violations go unpunished. But in Paula Lopez’s case, justice was served.


The Jack in the Box franchise agreed to pay the equivalent of 1,440 hours in back salary to settle a matter involving their long-time employee Paula Lopez, allegedly a victim of wage theft and then fired when she was 5-months pregnant. Unlike the many California fast food workers that are unwitting victims of wage theft, Paula knew something was wrong. She decided to learn more about her rights and ask for help. Paula called Lawyers For Employee & Consumer Rights at 844-697-4448 for a free case review.

5-months pregnant and fired… how did this happen?

In her fifth month of pregnancy, Paula used a sick day. On the following day Paula was fired. Allegedly the Jack in the Box franchise management staff where she worked knew that Paula was pregnant and knew that she was taking days off because she was pregnant. In most U.S. workplaces, firing someone due to being pregnant is a violation.


According to the U.S. Department of Labor, The Family and Medical Leave Act entitles eligible employees of mandated employers to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons.

Denied meal and rest breaks? It’s called wage theft.

In addition to being fired unfairly, Paula was also not granted all of her lunch breaks or rest breaks. When fast food restaurants deny an employee meal or rest breaks, they are literally stealing money from their employees. It’s called wage theft—when an employer does not pay or underpays employees for time worked.


Wage theft by employers can be any of the following:

  • Paying less than the minimum wage
  • Paying the tipped minimum wage for non-tipped work tasks
  • Refusing to provide overtime pay
  • Failing to give workers meal breaks
  • Failing to give workers rest breaks
  • Requiring off-the-clock work

Restaurant Industry Notorious for Wage Theft

Wage theft permeates the restaurant industry, from fast food restaurants to fine dining establishments. According to a recent New York Times editorial, the Department of Labor’s wage and hour division reported almost “84 percent of full-service restaurants it investigated had violated labor standards.” Indeed, the facts don’t lie, says Saru Jayaraman, co-founder and co-director of the Restaurant Opportunities Center United, “The poorest workers in America are being stolen from the most.” The Institute for Policy Research agrees, reporting that certain groups—women, minorities, non-U.S. citizens, and nonunion workers—are all more likely to suffer from wage theft.

The restaurant and fast food industries will continue to steal wages from employees for one simple reason: because they believe they can get away with it. Don’t let that happen.

Know Your Rights  |  Tell Us YOUR Story

Because California is an “at-will” employment state (employers are free to terminate employees at any time) employees think that they have no rights. Nothing could be further from the truth. Learn more about your employee rights. Contact us today.

Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights (LFECR) is a leading California employment law firm. With more than forty remote attorneys, LFECR is prepared to work on behalf of their clients anywhere in California.


If you believe your workplace rights have been violated, it’s important to call an experienced employment law firm that specializes in protecting workers’ rights.


Employment laws are broken by employers every day. Aggressive representation will empower you, opening the door to numerous options, including but not limited to filing a complaint with the proper governmental body, negotiating an out of court settlement, or if necessary, filing a lawsuit and representing you in court. Keep in mind, many employment disputes are resolved without a lawsuit or trial. That’s why selecting an experienced law firm like LFECR is a smart choice. Chances are they will negotiate the best possible terms and settlement for your case.


Reporting on workplace disputes, The Washington Post was clear: It’s smarter and safer “to consult with an employment expert before taking any action… go straight to an employment lawyer.”


By starting the process with an expert from LFECR, the strongest and most effective path to your success will be taken from the outset—using the power of the law in YOUR favor. Consulting with an LFECR attorney will help you make informed decisions about the best way to proceed with your case.

Share on Social Media

What Is Quid Pro Quo Harassment - Examples and Employee Rights in California

July 14, 2026
What Is an Example of Quid Pro Quo Harassment at Work? Quid pro quo harassment occurs when someone with authority over an employee makes a job benefit or employment decision contingent on the employee accepting or rejecting unwelcome sexual advances or other inappropriate sexual conduct. In other words, a supervisor or manager may suggest, either directly or indirectly, that a promotion, raise, preferred schedule, continued employment, or another workplace benefit depends on the employee complying with an inappropriate request. Many employees have heard the term quid pro quo harassment but are unsure whether it applies to their own experience. Unlike a hostile work environment, which often develops through repeated conduct over time, quid pro quo harassment can occur during a single conversation or incident. The key issue is whether an employment opportunity or consequence was tied to unwanted sexual conduct. In this guide, we'll explain what quid pro quo harassment means under California law, review common workplace examples, and discuss the rights employees may have if they experience this type of unlawful conduct. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.

What Is Considered Workplace Harassment in California? Common Examples and Your Legal Rights

July 6, 2026
What Qualifies as Workplace Harassment in California? Workplace harassment generally involves unwelcome conduct based on a legally protected characteristic that is severe enough or pervasive enough to create a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment. Not every rude comment, personality conflict, or difficult supervisor violates California law. However, when harassment is based on characteristics such as sex, race, disability, religion, age, or another protected status, employees may have important legal rights.  Many employees wonder whether what they are experiencing is simply an unpleasant work environment or something that may violate California law. The answer depends on the specific facts, including what happened, why it happened, how often it occurred, and whether it was connected to a protected characteristic. Understanding what qualifies as workplace harassment is the first step toward protecting your rights. In this guide, we'll explain what workplace harassment is under California law, review common real-world examples, and discuss what employees can do if they believe they have been subjected to unlawful harassment. If any of these situations sound familiar, our office is always available to answer your questions and help you better understand your legal options.

Can My Employer Monitor My Emails, Text Messages, or Personal Phone in California

June 30, 2026
Can My Employer Legally Monitor My Emails, Text Messages, or Personal Phone? Sometimes, but not always. California employers generally have broad authority to monitor communications and activity on company-owned devices, email accounts, and computer systems. However, that does not mean they can freely access your personal phone, private email account, text messages, or other personal information whenever they choose. Whether the monitoring is lawful often depends on who owns the device, what company policies are in place, whether you gave consent, and the specific facts surrounding the situation. Many employees assume they have no privacy rights once they walk into work. Others believe their personal devices and accounts are always protected, even when they use them for work-related purposes. The reality falls somewhere in between, and California provides employees with stronger workplace privacy protections than many other states. If you believe your employer may have crossed the line, understanding where those legal boundaries exist is an important first step. Below are some of the most common questions employees ask about workplace monitoring, what employers can legally access, and when it may be appropriate to speak with a California employment attorney. If your situation is not covered here, our office is always available to answer your questions.
More Posts